Before you survey anyone
Consent, assent, minors, and the approval that must come before recruitment — not after.
- consent
- irb
- surveys
- +1
Curated guides, templates, and reading — the things worth knowing before you need them.
21 resources
Consent, assent, minors, and the approval that must come before recruitment — not after.
A decision path from your design to the right test, and what to do when the assumptions fail.
scikit-learn's own guide to data leakage, improper splits, and the mistakes that inflate accuracy.
Variables, controls, replication, randomisation, and blinding — what each one is protecting you from.
The current rules and forms. Always download from here rather than reusing a copy from last year — numbering and requirements change.
The three-pass method: how to decide in ten minutes whether a paper is worth an hour.
Attribution, data handling, and the grey areas that get projects disqualified.
A folder layout and a set of habits that keep a computational project reproducible.
A seven-sentence skeleton that fits the usual word limit and covers everything judges look for.
Twelve recurring interview questions and what a strong answer contains.
Patterns that recur in projects that place, drawn from judging rubrics rather than from any single project.
Negative, positive, vehicle, and sham controls — and how to tell which your experiment needs.
Sterile technique, sealed plates, and a disposal plan you can point a reviewer at.
The vocabulary of scientific caution, and why over-claiming costs more than it gains.
What the null hypothesis is actually for, and why "I rejected the null" is not the same as "I proved my idea".
Turning "healthier", "faster", and "better" into something two people would measure the same way.
Which of the sixteen SDS sections actually change your protocol, and what to extract from each.
A five-column method for identifying and controlling hazards in mechanical, electrical, and thermal builds.
Why chronological reviews read badly, and what to organise by instead.
Wording, scales, and order effects — the bias you build in before anyone answers.
Why 94% accuracy can be a terrible result, and what to compare against instead.