Verifiedintermediate
Designing an experiment that survives review
Variables, controls, replication, randomisation, and blinding — what each one is protecting you from.
- design
- controls
- replication
- +1
Experimental Design9 min
Resources
Curated guides, templates, and reading — the things worth knowing before you need them.
9 resources
Verifiedintermediate
Reading a paper without reading all of it
The three-pass method: how to decide in ten minutes whether a paper is worth an hour.
- reading
- triage
- notes
Literature Reviews7 min
Verifiedintermediate
Structuring an analysis you can defend
A folder layout and a set of habits that keep a computational project reproducible.
- reproducibility
- code
- structure
Programming7 min
Verifiedintermediate
The questions judges actually ask
Twelve recurring interview questions and what a strong answer contains.
- judging
- interview
- questions
Verifiedintermediate
What separates a finalist project from a good one
Patterns that recur in projects that place, drawn from judging rubrics rather than from any single project.
- judging
- rubrics
- quality
Example Projects8 min
Verifiedintermediate
Hedging: saying exactly how sure you are
The vocabulary of scientific caution, and why over-claiming costs more than it gains.
- claims
- hedging
- precision
Scientific Writing6 min
Verifiedintermediate
Operational definitions
Turning "healthier", "faster", and "better" into something two people would measure the same way.
- measurement
- definitions
- reproducibility
Verifiedintermediate
Reading a safety data sheet
Which of the sixteen SDS sections actually change your protocol, and what to extract from each.
- sds
- ppe
- risk-assessment
Hazardous Chemicals6 min
Verifiedintermediate
Structuring a literature review
Why chronological reviews read badly, and what to organise by instead.
- writing
- structure
- argument
Literature Reviews6 min